Training Young Doctors to Think Like Scientists

     There are many reasons why people think we should train doctors to think like scientists. One of the more popular reasons is because people think that doctors should be doing research and running new trials as opposed to just helping people. I think that the more we know about medicine the better, but I also think that doctors should not put 95% of the time they work in to a new trial for a dissease. Doctors are trained to help people from the start. If we want out doctors to think like scientists, then we need to start there when people first come to medical school or any type of schooling to become a doctor. https://nyulangone.org/news/training-young-doctors-think-scientists

Comments

  1. AnonymousDecember 15, 2020 at 8:06 AM

    I think that doctors should learn to do some research because they have a different perspective on certain things. For example, they are able to understand more in depth with what happens to patients, versus just watching cells react in a lab. I also think that with a different perspective, it could lead to more life saving breakthroughs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJanuary 6, 2021 at 4:34 PM

    I disagree, I feel that doctors should not be the ones that are doing the research and discovering new breakthrough treatments. Though they could help and give input in the treatments and administer the treatments to the patients. Rather than researching and coming up with treatments, they should be helping the patients. They main goal of a doctor is to help the patient, so this means their main focus should be getting the patient healthy again instead of focusing on the research.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Law enforcement intercepted a ricen laced package and letter sent to Donald Trump that supposedly came from St. Hubert Quebec. A women has been arrested in the case but they are still investigating.  Ricin is a highly toxic compound extracted from castor beans that has been used in terror plots. It can be used in powder, pellet, mist or acid form. If ingested, it causes nausea, vomiting and internal bleeding of the stomach and intestines, followed by failure of the liver, spleen and kidneys, and death by collapse of the circulatory system .
Read more

Current event

I am just doing a trial current event-  Are you supposed to put the link to your article in the summary?  Do you know how to do that?  My current event is an article from the magazine The Week.  It is titled   It's not just the germs — it's also the genes  The article discusses how a person's genes play a part in how viruses react within that body.  It talks about how some people may get a virus more seriously than another & how scientists can look at that information and develop therapies from.  Just so you know The Week pulls articles from other sources-  I did backtrack to check the source they got the original article from & it checks out. 
Read more

Over 87,000 papers published on coronavirus since start of pandemic

 Over 87,000 papers have been published about this global pandemic. When most people think of the pandemic going around right now, they think about how awful it all is. How many people have died, how many people have lost a family member, or how many people they have lost relationships with friends or family. But, do people ever think about how this event will go down in history, and how it will affect science studies in the future? We never know what type of science we will come across in the future, but we can say that science evolves every day, and things are constantly changing. This is why so many people are interested in this pandemic. The more we know about this pandemic, the more we can do to try and change is. So, what will science bring in the future? And how will it impact future in sciences? We won't know the answer to either of those questions for a long time, but we can certainly say that it will evolve so much, and make things a lot more interesting.    htt...
Read more